Margins and the Mainstream

April 20th, 2012 | Posted by david kefford in books | discussion | R&D | research - (0 Comments)

For a couple of ‘spare’ pounds you might be interested in downloading Jamie Q’s MA Fine Art thesis:  Do-It-Yourself: Politics and Aesthetics in the Margins and the Mainstream

It begins from a self-critical point of wanting to produce art that is not dependent on theory. It argues for the social value of non-theoretical object-based artwork, specifically regarding its potential as a form of local resistance to dominant systems of production and distribution. It outlines the complexities of the DIY (do-it-yourself) ethic, and identifies its art-historical precedents in Dada and Fluxus activities. In addition to describing a mode of production or a political position, DIY can also refer to aesthetic qualities. By analyzing the work of artists whose work critics describe as DIY—including Chris Johanson, Margaret Kilgallen, and Barry McGee—the text addresses issues of corporate sponsorship and the marketability of marginality. Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic capital provides a key framework for examining value systems in both the margins and the mainstream, while Andrea Fraser’s discourse around institutional critique dissolves conceptions of “inside” and “outside.” The inquiry is prefaced by contextualizing the text in relation to the author’s own studio practice.

Get it here